Your propaganda is really biased, like all the anti-MS press who’s just making itself ridiculous.
Under “revenue growth” you are telling share value. Ok MSFT is not IBM, their shareholer is not California grandma’s plan. Revenue growth from MSFT was 25b$, it was 70b$ in 2011 (+280%).
Apple’s revenue was 5,36b$, and it was 28b$ in 2011 (+500%). IBM revenue was 85.9 b$, it was 106b$ in 2011 (+23%). So is it Worth to bash your competitor (MSFT) because they make only 10+ times the growth you make ?? Ohh and because there’s another competitor there who makes 20+ times the growth ? That’s a shame.
Your propaganda is really biased, like all the anti-MS press who’s just making itself ridiculous.
Under “revenue growth” you are telling share value. Ok MSFT is not IBM, their shareholer is not California grandma’s plan. Revenue growth from MSFT was 25b$, it was 70b$ in 2011 (+280%).
Apple’s revenue was 5,36b$, and it was 28b$ in 2011 (+500%). IBM revenue was 85.9 b$, it was 106b$ in 2011 (+23%). So is it Worth to bash your competitor (MSFT) because they make only 10+ times the growth you make ?? Ohh and because there’s another competitor there who makes 20+ times the growth ? That’s a shame.